使用一种新型仪器对单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术的随机对照试验

介绍

由于单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术的出现（SILC）1997，一直存在争论，根据回顾性报告，出现了可能的缺点，如冲突的器械和手术三角损失争议。大多数的报道都集中在SILC安全的的可行性，以及上面提到的缺点，作为重要的因素。同时，仪器的创新尝试与单切口腹腔镜手术的理念保持同步（SILS）。几个专门设计的工具，如弯曲的腹腔镜器械，已被引入，试图解决上述问题。然而，一种新型仪器的优点必须通过随机对照试验（RCT）验证，却很少被报道。在这项研究中，我们报告我们的RCT的SILC使用一种新的腹腔镜器械和一个可调旋转手腕。


参考
[1] G. Navarra, E. Pozza, S. Occhionorelli, P. Carcoforo, I. Donini, One-wound
laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Br. J. Surg. 84 (1997) 695.
[2] N. Tamini, M. Rota, E. Bolzonaro, et al., Single-incision versus standard
multiple-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of experimental
and observational studies, Surg. Innov. 21 (5) (2014) 528e545.
[3] F.A. Madureira, J.E. Manso, D. Madureira Filho, A.C. Iglesias, Inflammation in
laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy,
Surg. Innov. 21 (3) (2013) 263e268, 14.
[4] S.R. Markar, A. Karthikesalingam, S. Thrumurthy, L. Muirhead, J. Kinross,
P. Paraskeva, Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional
multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis, Surg.
Endosc. 26 (5) (2012) 1205e1213.
[5] H. Yin, Z. Wang, J. Xu, Y. Guan, B. Zhai, L. Zhao, A specific instrument to
facilitate single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an initial experience,
Surg. Innov. 18 (3) (2011) 289e293.
[6] V. Banz, T. Gsponer, D. Candinas, U. Guller, Population-based analysis of 4113
patients with acute cholecystitis: defining the optimal time-point for laparoscopic
cholecystectomy, Ann. Surg. 254 (6) (2011) 964e970.
[7] M. Joseph, M.R. Phillips, T.M. Farrell, C.C. Rupp, Single incision laparoscopic
cholecystectomy is associated with a higher bile duct injury rate: a review and
a word of caution, Ann. Surg. 256 (1) (2012) 1e6.
[8] J. Ma, M.A. Cassera, G.O. Spaun, C.W. Hammill, P.D. Hansen, S. Aliabadi-Wahle,
Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Ann. Surg. 254 (1)
(2011) 22e27.
[9] S. Trastulli, R. Cirocchi, J. Desiderio, et al., Systematic review and meta-analysis
of randomized clinical trials comparing single-incision versus conventional
laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Br. J. Surg. 100 (2) (2013) 191e208.
[10] J. Zehetner, D. Pelipad, A. Darehzereshki, R.J. Mason, J.C. Lipham, N. Katkhouda,
Single-access laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy:
a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized
controlled trials, Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan. Tech. 23 (3) (2013)
235e243.
[11] P.C. Lee, C. Lo, P.S. Lai, et al., Randomized clinical trial of single-incision
laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy, Br.
J. Surg. 97 (7) (2010) 1007e1012.
[12] D. Osborne, B. Boe, A.S. Rosemurgy, E.E. Zervos, Twenty-millimeter laparoscopic
cholecystectomy: fewer ports results in less pain, shorter hospitalization,
and faster recovery, Am. Surg. 71 (4) (2005) 298e302.
[13] E.C. Tsimoyiannis, K.E. Tsimogiannis, G. Pappas-Gogos, et al., Different pain
scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus
classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial, Surg.
Endosc. 24 (8) (2010) 1842e1848.
[14] H. Sinan, S. Demirbas, M.T. Ozer, I. Sucullu, M. Akyol, Single-incision laparoscopic
cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective
randomized study, Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan. Tech. 22 (1) (2012)
12e16.
[15] A. Pisanu, I. Reccia, G. Porceddu, A. Uccheddu, Meta-analysis of prospective
randomized studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
(SILC) and conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CMLC),
J. Gastrointest. Surg. 16 (9) (2012) 1790e1801.

英文原文：
A randomized controlled trial comparing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystec.pdf (477.55 KB, 下载次数: 0, 售价: 99 香叶)

2016-8-10 07:46 上传

点击文件名下载附件