1. Introduction
As the inferior aspect of the pericardial sac is in close contact with the diaphragm, a pericardial effusion can be easily approached through the abdomen (Mayer, 1993) using a laparotomy or laparoscopy (Mann et al., 1994; Sastic et al., 1992).
These are useful alternatives for patients who cannot tolerate a thoracoscopic approach because of poor hemodynamic or respiratory conditions. Compared to the conventional subxiphoid approach, laparoscopy allows for better visualization and permits the creation of a large pericardial window. Further advantages of the laparoscopic approach are as follows (Rodriguez et al., 1999):
- the pericardium is readily and safely accessible through the diaphragm since no structures lie between the tendinous part of the diaphragm and the pericardial sac;
- direct communication with the abdominal cavity offers a large surface for pericardial fluid resorption;
- no penetration of the chest wall and pleura is involved, and single lung ventilation is not required;
- there is no need for postoperative chest drainage;
- a short hospital stay is sufficient. |