1. Introduction
Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) was introduced in the early 1990s as an alternative to abdominal hysterectomy. In a recent large hospital survey in Ohio, USA, only 8% of all hysterectomies were performed with laparoscopic assistance (Weber and Lee, 1996). LAVH is a safe alternative to abdominal hysterectomy when a vaginal hysterectomy is contraindicated. A randomized clinical trial showed that vaginal hysterectomy and LAVH were associated with similar hospital stays, and similar intraoperative and postoperative morbidity. Operative times and costs were higher in the LAVH group (Summitt et al., 1992).
In several prospective randomized clinical trials of LAVH versus total abdominal hysterectomy, the former was associated with less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays and a more rapid return to normal activities (Summit et al., 1998; Marana et al., 1999; Falcone et al., 1999; Ferrari et al., 2000). Several studies have shown that the costs of LAVH were similar to (Summitt et al., 1998; Falcone et al., 1999) or less than (Ellstrom et al., 1998) the costs of total abdominal hysterectomy.
There are several classifications of laparoscopic hysterectomy. The laparoscopic ligation of the uterine artery appears to be the critical step that differentiates a laparoscopic procedure from LAVH. In fact this division is arbitrary. In practice, the procedure is continued laparoscopically until the surgeon is confident that the procedure can be completed vaginally. However in some cases, the anatomy does not permit any portion to be performed vaginally and the whole procedure is carried out laparoscopically. |