3. Indications
A Heller myotomy is performed via a laparoscopic or thoracoscopic approach. Most authors recommend laparoscopy, which may be combined with an antireflux procedure. The alternative thoracoscopic approach was popularized by Pellegrini et al. (1992), who perform it routinely, preferring it to laparoscopy. In 17 patients who were operated on using the thoracoscopic approach, the procedure failed in 3 of the early patients, who then underwent a second operation via an abdominal approach (1 laparotomy and 2 laparoscopies) (Pellegrini et al., 1992).
These failures occurred because the myotomy was not extended far enough onto the stomach. Though this can initially be a limiting factor for the technique, when performed by experienced surgeons, the stomach can easily be exposed using a thoracic approach. A fundoplication cannot be combined with this approach, however. In the series of Pellegrini et al., there were 2 cases of symptomatic reflux, objectively measured by pH-monitoring. According to the author, the low reflux rate is related to the fact that dissection of the gastroesophageal junction is less extensive in thoracoscopy than in laparoscopy. Maher (1997) reported similar findings: out of a series of 21 patients who underwent thoracoscopic surgery, only 1 case of clinical reflux was observed.
Laparoscopic access to the megaesophagus is still considered the approach of choice, especially when the surgeon combines an anti-reflux procedure with the myotomy (Pellegrini et al., 1992). In addition, patients generally tolerate laparoscopy better than thoracoscopy, which can cause persisting intercostal pain for a number of weeks postoperatively. Nevertheless, mastering the thoracoscopic approach is useful, especially for patients with a contraindication to the abdominal approach, or for whom a high myotomy is indicated (Shimi et al., 1992). |